Get A Quote


    Indirect Tax Advisory

    CBIC GST Circulars 207–222/2024: Detailed Analysis and Key Implications for Businesses

    The Central Board of Indirect Tax & Customs (CBIC) has issued GST Circulars 207–222/2024 to clarify critical aspects of GST law, including valuation, input tax credit (ITC), place and time of supply, and sector-specific tax treatments. These circulars directly impact how businesses interpret GST provisions in areas prone to disputes—such as related-party transactions, RCM compliance, insurance taxation, and contractual arrangements.

    This analysis provides a circular-wise breakdown of key clarifications, regulatory intent, and practical implications, enabling businesses to align their positions with current GST expectations and reduce compliance risk. For organizations managing complex tax structures, these updates should be evaluated alongside broader taxation advisory and direct tax frameworks to ensure consistency across tax positions.

    Detailed Overview of CBIC GST Circulars 207–222/2024

    To provide a consolidated view, the table below summarizes all circulars along with their core focus areas. This helps in quickly identifying the applicability of each clarification before moving into detailed analysis. The circulars broadly address litigation thresholds, ITC eligibility, valuation rules, place and time of supply, and sector-specific tax treatments, making them highly relevant across industries.

    Circular No

    Description
    207/01/2024-GST Reduction of Government Litigation –fixing monetary limits for filing appeals or applications by the department before GSTAT, High Courts and Supreme Court
    208/02/2024-GST Clarifications on various issues pertaining to special procedure for the manufacturers of the specified commodities as per Notification No. 04/2024-Central Tax dated 05.01.2024
    209/03/2024-GST Clarifications on the provisions of clause (ca) of section 10(1) of the Integrated Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 relating to place of supply of goods to unregistered persons
    210/04/2024-GST Clarification on valuation of supply of import of services by a related person where recipient is eligible to full input tax credit
    211/05/2024-GST Clarification on the time limit under Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 in respect of RCM supplies received from unregistered persons.
    212/06/2024-GST Clarification on mechanism for providing evidence of compliance of conditions of Section 15(3)(b)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 by the suppliers
    213/07/2024-GST Clarification on the taxability of ESOP/ESPP/RSU provided by a company to its employees through its overseas holding company
    214/08/2024-GST Clarification on the requirement of reversal of input tax credit in respect of the portion of the premium for life insurance policies which is not included in taxable value
    215/09/2024-GST Clarification on taxability of wreck and salvage value earmarked in the claim assessment of the damage caused to the motor vehicle
    216/10/2024-GST Clarification in respect of GST liability and input tax credit availability in cases involving warranty/extended warranty in furtherance to Circular No. 195/07/2023-GST dated 17.07.2023
    217/11/2024-GST Entitlement of ITC by the insurance companies on the expenses incurred for repair of motor vehicles in case of reimbursement mode of insurance claim settlement.
    218/12/2024-GST Clarification regarding taxability of the transaction of providing loan by an overseas affiliate to its Indian affiliate or by a person to a related person.
    219/13/2024-GST Clarification on availability of input tax credit on ducts and manholes used in network of optical fiber cables (OFCs) in terms of section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017
    220/14/2024-GST Clarification on place of supply applicable for custodial services provided by banks to foreign portfolio investors.
    221/15/2024-GST Clarification on time of supply in respect of supply of services of construction of road and maintenance thereof of National Highway Projects of National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) in Hybrid Annuity Mode (HAM) model
    222/16/2024-GST Clarification on time of supply of services of spectrum usage and other similar services under GST

    Analysis of the circulars are as below:

    Circular No: 207/01/2024-GST:

    Reduction of Government Litigation fixing monetary limits for filing appeals or applications by the department before GSTAT, High Courts and Supreme Court

    GST council fixes the following monetary limits below which appeal or application or special leave petition as the case may be shall not be filed by the central tax officers before Goods and Service tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), High Court and Supreme Court under the provisions of the CGST Act, subject to the exclusions.

    Appellate Forum Monetary Limit (Amount in Rs.)
    GSTAT 20,00,000/-
    High Court 1,00,00,000/-
    Supreme Court 2,00,00,000/-

    While determining whether a case falls within the above monetary limits or not, the following principles are to be considered:

    Dispute pertains to Amount to be considered
    Demand of tax Aggregate tax only (including CGST, SGST, IGST and Compensation Cess)
    Interest Interest
    Imposition of penalty Penalty
    Imposition of late fee Late fee
    Demand of interest, penalty or late fee(without involving any disputed tax amount) Aggregate of interest, penalty and fee
    Erroneous refund Refund in dispute
    Composite orders (more than one appeal/demand notice) Total amount of tax, interest, penalty, late fee inclusive of all appeal or demand notice

    Exclusions: Monetary limits specified above for filing appeal or application or special leave petition by the department before GSTAT and High Court and for filing special leave petition or appeal before the Supreme Court shall be applicable in all cases except the following circumstances where the decision to file appeal shall be taken on merits irrespective of the said monetary limits.

    1. Ultra vires rules or regulations or provisions and constitutional changes
    2. Matters related to valuation, classification, refunds, place of supply of goods or services or other issues
    3. Adverse comments or cost imposed against the government/department or their officers

    Circular No: 208/02/2024-GST:

    Clarifications on various issues pertaining to special procedure for the manufacturers of the specified commodities as per Notification No. 04/2024-Central Tax dated 05.01.2024

    Issues raised by Trade Clarification on the issue
    Manufacturers using very old packing machines since decades including second hand machines. Details of make, model and machine numbers are not readily available As per the Notification No. 04/2024-CT dated 05.01.2024, make and model number are optional but machine number is a mandatory field. However, where the make of the machine is not available, the year of the purchase of machinery may be declared as a make number. If the machine number is not available either on the machine or as per the applicable documents/records then manufacturer may assign any numeric number to the machine.
    Electricity consumption rating of the packing machine is not available in the specifications of the said machine or in the document/record of the same Manufacturer can get electricity consumption per hour of the said machine through a Chartered Engineer and declared accordingly in Form GST SRM-I
    Goods having no MRP, for example goods manufactured for export market Manufacturers shall report the sale price in Form GST SRM-II
    Qualification and eligibility of Chartered Engineer for providing Chartered Engineer Certificate under the special procedure Practicing Chartered Engineer having a certificate of practice (COP) form the Institute of Engineers India (IEI) is qualified to provide a Chartered Engineer Certificate
    Whether Special procedures notified is applicable to the manufacturing units located in SEZ or manual processes using electric operated heat sealer and seamer? The special procedure does not apply to manufacturing units located in SEZ or manual processes using electric operated heat sealer and seamer.
    Where multiple machines are required for filing, capping and packing of containers, the serial number of which machine is required to be declared Details of the machine is to be required which is being used for final packing of the packages of the specified goods.
    In case of job work or contract manufacturing which person shall be required to comply with the special procedure The special procedure applies to all the persons involved in the manufacturing processes, including job workers and contract manufacturers. If a job worker or contract manufactured is unregistered, the principal manufacturer must comply with the special procedure.

     Circular No: 209/03/2024-GST:

    Clarifications on the provisions of clause (ca) of section 10(1) of the Integrated Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 relating to place of supply of goods to unregistered persons 

    Issue Clarification on the issue
    Place of supply of goods (particularly being supplied through e-commerce platform) to unregistered person where billing address is different from the address of delivery of goods If billing and delivery address are different, the delivery address determines the place of supply.
    Electricity consumption rating of the packing machine is not available in the specifications of the said machine or in the document/record of the same Manufacturer can get electricity consumption per hour of the said machine through a Chartered Engineer and declared accordingly in Form GST SRM-I
    Goods having no MRP, for example goods manufactured for export market Manufacturers shall report the sale price in Form GST SRM-II
    Qualification and eligibility of Chartered Engineer for providing Chartered Engineer Certificate under the special procedure Practicing Chartered Engineer having a certificate of practice form the Institute of Engineers India (IEI) is qualified to provide a Chartered Engineer Certificate
    Whether Special procedures notified is applicable to the manufacturing units located in SEZ or manual processes using electric operated heat sealer and seamer? The special procedure does not apply to manufacturing units located in SEZ or manual processes using electric operated heat sealer and seamer.
    Where multiple machines are required for filing, capping and packing of containers, the serial number of which machine is required to be declared Details of the machine is to be required which is being used for final packing of the packages of the specified goods.
    In case of job work or contract manufacturing which person shall be required to comply with the special procedure The special procedure applies to all the persons involved in the manufacturing processes, including job workers and contract manufacturers. If a job worker or contract manufactured is unregistered, the principal manufacturer must comply with the special procedure.
    Place of supply of goods (particularly being supplied through e-commerce platform) to unregistered persons where billing address is different from the address of delivery of the goods If the billing and delivery address is different, the delivery address determines the place of supply. Supplier should record the delivery address as the address of the recipient on the invoice for the purpose of determination of place of supply of goods.

     Circular No: 210/04/2024-GST:

    Clarification on valuation of supply of import of services by a related person where recipient is eligible to full input tax credit

    • The second proviso to rule 28(1) of CGST rules, is applicable in all the cases involving supply of goods or services or both between the distinct person as well as related persons, in case where the full ITC is available to the recipient. Accordingly, it is evident that the clarification which has been issued vide circular No. 199/11/2023-GST dated 17.07.2023 in respect of supplies of services between the distinct persons is equally applicable in respect of import of services between related persons.
    • Therefore, it is clarified that in case where the foreign affiliate is providing certain services to the related domestic entity and where the full ITC is available to the related domestic entity, value of such supply of services declared in the invoice by the related domestic entity deemed as open market value in terms of second proviso to rule 28(1) of CGST rules.
    • Where the full ITC is available to the recipient, if the invoice is not issued by the related domestic entity with respect to any service provided by the foreign affiliate to it, the value of such services may be deemed to be declared as NIL and may be deemed as open market value.

    Circular No: 211/05/2024-GST:

    Clarification on the time limit under Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 in respect of RCM supplies received from unregistered persons.

    • It is clarified that in case of supplies received from unregistered suppliers, where tax has to be paid by the recipient under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and where invoice is to be issued by the recipient of the supplies in accordance with section 31(3)(f) of CGST Act, the relevant financial year for calculation of time limit for availment of ITC under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 will be the financial year in which the invoice has been issued by the recipient under Section 31(3)(f) of the CGST Act, 2017 subject to the payment of tax on the said supply by the recipient and fulfilment of other conditions and restrictions of Section 16 & 17 of the CGST Act, 2017
    • If the recipient issues the invoice after the time of supply of the said supply and pay tax accordingly he will be required to pay interest on such delay payment of tax
    • In cases of such delayed issuance of invoice by the recipient, he may also liable to penal action under the provision of Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017

    Circular No: 212/06/2024-GST:

    Clarification on mechanism for providing evidence of compliance of conditions of Section 15(3)(b)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 by the suppliers

    • Circular clarifies that till the time a facility is made available on the common portal to enable the suppliers as well as tax officers to verify whether the ITC attributable to such discounts offered through tax credit notes has been reversed by the recipient or not, the supplier may procure a certificate from the recipient of supply issued by the CA or CMA certifying that the recipient has made the required proportionate reversal of ITC at his end.
    • Certificate issued by the CA or CMA shall contain Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) and may include details such as details of credit notes, the details of relevant invoice number against which the said credit note has been issued, the amount of ITC reversal in respect of each of the said credit notes along with the details of Form GST DRC-03/return/other relevant document through which such reversal of ITC has been made by the recipient.
    • In case tax involved in the post discount given by the supplier to a recipient through tax credit notes in a financial year is not exceeding Rs. 5 Lakhs, supplier may procure an undertaking/certificate from the recipient instead of CA or CMA certificate.
    • Certificates issued by the CA/CMA/ Recipient shall be treated as a suitable and admissible evidence and supplier shall produce such certificate or undertakings before the tax officers if required during any proceedings such as scrutiny, audit investigation etc., even for the past period cases.

    Circular No: 213/07/2024-GST:

    Clarification on the taxability of ESOP/ESPP/RSU provided by a company to its employees through its overseas holding company

    • Issuance of shares/securities as ESOP/ESPP/RSU by the foreign holding company to the employees of the domestic subsidiary company neither be treated as supply of goods nor supply of services because securities included shares under GST law are considered neither goods or services in terms of definition of “goods and services”. Accordingly, purchase or sale of shares/securities is neither a supply of goods nor a supply of services. Therefore, GST is not leviable on transaction of sale/purchase/transfer of securities/shares.
    • The securities/ shares being issued as a part of remuneration of employee by the employer as per the terms of the employment falls outside the ambit of scope of supply as per Entry 1 of schedule III of the CGST Act, Therefore GST is not leviable on the compensation paid to the employee by the employer as per the terms of the employment contract.
    • Where a foreign holding company directly transfer such shares/securities to the employees of the domestic subsidiary company and domestic subsidiary company reimburses an amount for such securities/shares on cost to cost basis i.e. without any additional fee, mark up or commission to the foreign holding co, then the said reimbursement for transfer of shares/securities cannot be treated as import of services by the domestic subsidiary company from the foreign holding company and hence is not liable to GST.
    • If the foreign holding company charges any additional fees, mark up or commission for issuing the shares or securities it will be considered as supply of services and in such case GST will be payable by the domestic subsidiary company on a reverse charge basis.

    Circular No: 214/08/2024-GST:

    Clarification on the requirement of reversal of input tax credit in respect of the portion of the premium for life insurance policies which is not included in taxable value

    • Life insurance business includes any unit linked insurance policy or scrips or any such instrument or units which provides a component of investment and a component of insurance issues by an insurer.
    • As per Rule 32(4) of the CGST Rules, in case of life insurance policies, the value of supply is only that portion of the premium which is attributable to risk cover. Portion of the premium which is attributable to investment/savings is not included in the value and to be deducted from the gross premium.
    • The amount of the premium which is not included in the taxable value cannot be treated as pertaining to a non-taxable or exempt supply and therefore there is no requirement of reversal of ITC as per provisions of Rule 42 or 43 of the CGST Rules.

     Circular No: 215/09/2024-GST:

    Clarification on taxability of wreck and salvage value earmarked in the claim assessment of the damage caused to the motor vehicle.

    Issue Clarification on the issue
    Whether the insurance company is liable to pay GST on the salvage/wreckage value embarked in the claim assessment of the damage caused to the motor vehicle? Where value of salvage/wreckage is deducted from the claim settlement amount in case of total loss to the vehicle.

    1. In such case, salvage/wreckage does not become the property of the insurance company, the ownership remains with the insured
    2. The deduction of the salvage value from the insurance settlement amount cannot be said to be consideration for any supply being made by insurance company.
    3. Therefore, no liability of GST on insurance company in respect of salvage value.

    Situation where policy provides for settlement of claim on full Insured’s Declared Value (IDV) without deduction of value of salvage/wreck.

    1. Salvage becomes the property of the insurance company
    2. Outward GST liability on disposal/sale of the salvage is to be discharged by the insurance companies.

     

    Circular No: 216/10/2024-GST:

    Clarification in respect of GST liability and input tax credit availability in cases involving warranty/extended warranty in furtherance to Circular No. 195/07/2023-GST dated 17.07.2023

    • Circular No. 195/07/2023-GST dated 17.03.2023 clarifies regarding GST liability as well as liability to reverse ITC, only in cases involving replacement of ‘parts’ and not if goods as such are replaced under warranty. Request has been made to also issue a clarification in respect of cases where the goods as such are replaced under warranty. This circular also clarifies that the provision also applies when the entire goods are replaced under warranty.
    • Clarification in respect of cases where the distributor replaces the parts/goods to the customer under warranty out of his own stock and then raises a requisition to the manufacturer for the goods or the parts as the case may be. The manufacturer then provides the said goods or parts to the distributor through a delivery challan without additional cost, no GST is payable on such replenishment further no reversal of ITc is required to be made by the manufacturer in respect of goods or parts so replenished to the distributor.
    • Cases, where agreement for extended warranty is made at the time of original supply of goods and the supplier of extended warranty is different from the supplier of goods, the supply of extended warranty and supply of goods cannot be treated as the composite supply. In such case supply of extended warranty will be treated as a separate supply from the original supply of goods and;
    • Where the supply of extended warranty is made subsequent to the original supply of goods or where the supply of extended warranty is to be treated as a separate supply from the original supply of goods then supply of extended warranty will be treated as a supply of services distinct from the original supply of goods, and the supplier of the said extended warranty shall be liable to discharge GST liability applicable on such supply of eservices.

     

    Circular No: 217/11/2024-GST:

    Entitlement of ITC by the insurance companies on the expenses incurred for repair of motor vehicles in case of reimbursement mode of insurance claim settlement.

     

    Issue Clarification on the issue
     Whether the ITC is available to insurance companies in respect of repair expenses reimbursed by the insurance company, in case of reimbursement mode of claim settlement i.e. the amount to the garage is first paid by the policy holder/insured and subsequently the insurance company reimburses the approved claim costs to the insured?
    1. As per Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017, every registered person is entitled to take ITC on any supply of goods or services or both which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business.
    2. Under the CGST Act, the insurance company is considered the recipient of the repair services to the extent of approved repair liability. Moreover, as per Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that ITC in respect of services of repair of motor vehicles shall be available where received by a taxable person engaged in the supply of general insurance services in respect of motor vehicle insured by him.
    3. Accordingly, it is clarified that ITC is available to the insurance companies in respect of motor vehicle repair expenses incurred by them.
    What is the extent of ITC available to the insurance company in case the garage issues an invoice in excess of approved claim cost? ITC is available on the invoice issued to the insurance company to the extent of the amount reimbursed to the insured. If the invoice includes cost above the approved cost i.e. deductibles or depreciation, then ITC may be available to the insurance company only to the extent of reimbursement of the approved claim cost to the insured and not on full invoice value.
    Whether the ITC is available to the insurance company where the invoice for the repair of vehicle is not in the name of the insurance company? If the repair invoice is not issued in the name of the insurance company then ITC will not be available to the insurance company in respect of such an invoice.

     

    Circular No: 218/12/2024-GST:

    Clarification regarding taxability of the transactions of providing loan by an overseas affiliate to its Indian affiliate or by a person to a related person.

     

    Issue Clarification on the issue
    Whether the activity of providing loans by an overseas affiliate to its Indian affiliate or by a person to a related person, where there is no consideration in the nature of processing fees/administrative charges/loan granting charges etc. and the consideration is represented only by way of interest or discount, will be treated as taxable supply of service under GST or not?
    1. In case where no consideration is charged by the person from the related person or by an overseas affiliate from its Indian affiliate for an extended loan or credit other than by way of interest or discount, it cannot be said that supply of service is being provided between the related person in the form of processing/facilitating/administering the loan. Accordingly, question of levy of GST will not arise in this case.
    2. However, in case of loans provided between the related parties and any fees in the nature of processing fee/administrative charges/service fee/loan granting charges etc. is charged over and above the amount charged by  way of interest or discount the same may be considered to be the consideration for supply of services of processing/administering/facilitation of the loan which will be liable to GST as supply of services by the lender to the related persons availing the loan.

     Circular No: 219/13/2024-GST:

    Clarification on availability of ITC on ducts and manholes used in the network of optical fiber cables (OFC) in terms of Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017

     

    Issue Clarification on the issue
    Whether the ITC on the ducts and manholes used in network of optical fiber cable(OFC) for providing telecommunication services is barred in terms of Section 17(5)(C) and (d) of the CGST Act, read with explanation to Section 17 of CGST Act, 2017?
    1. In view of the explanation 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 it appears that ducts and manholes are covered under the definition of ‘plant & machinery’ as they are used as a part of the OFC network for making outward supply of transmission of telecommunication signal from one point to another. Ducts and manholes used in the network of OFC’s have not been specifically excluded from the definition of ‘plant & machinery’
    2. Accordingly, ITC is not restricted in respect of such ducts and manholes used in the network of OFC’s either under clause (c) or under clause (d) of Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.

    Circular No: 220/14/2024-GST:

    Clarification on place of supply applicable for custodial services provided by banks to Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI)

    Issue Clarification on the issue
    Whether the activity of providing Custodial Services by banks or financial institutions to FPIs will be treated as service provided to account holder under section 13(8)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017? Further how the place of supply of the said services shall be determined?
    1. As per the clarification given in education guide under the Service Tax Regime, the custodial services are not considered to be covered under the services provided by the bank to account holders. Therefore, they are not covered under Section 13(8)(a) of the IGST Act which applies to services linked to account operations like deposits and transfers.
    2. Accordingly, it is clarified that the custodial services provided by banks or financial institutions to FPIs are not to be treated as service provided to ‘account holder’. Therefore, the said services are not covered under Section 13(8)(a) of the IGST Act and hence place of supply shall be determined by the default provision which is the location of the recipient of the services as per Section 13(2) of the IGST Act.

    Circular No: 221/15/2024-GST:

    Clarification on time of supply in respect supply of services of construction of road and maintenance thereof of National Highway Projects of National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) in Hybrid Annuity Mode (HAM) model. 

    Issue Clarification on the issue
    Under HAM model of NHAI, the concessionaire has to construct the new road and provide operation and maintenance of the same which is generally over a period of 15-17 years and payment of the same is spread over the years. What is the time of supply for the purpose of payment of tax on the said service under the HAM model?
    1. If the invoice is issued on or before the specified date or date of completion of the event as per the contract, the time of supply is the date of issuance of invoice or receipts of payment whichever is earlier.
    2. If the invoice is not issued on or before the specified date or date of completion of the event as per the contract, the time of supply is the date of service provision or receipts of payment whichever is earlier.
    3. It is also clarified that the instalments/annuity payable by NHAI to the concessionaire also includes some interest component, the interest is also includible in the taxable value for GST purposes as per Section 15(2)(d) of the CGST Act.

     Circular No: 222/16/2024-GST:

    Clarification on time of supply of services of spectrum usage and other similar services under GST.

    Issue Clarification on the issue
    In cases of spectrum allocation where the successful bidder (i.e. the telecom operator) opts for making payments in instalments as mentioned in the Notice Inviting Application (NIA) and Frequency Assignment Letter (FAL) issued by department of telecommunications (DOT). Government of India, what will be the time of supply for the purpose of payment of GST on the said supply of spectrum allocation services.
    1. It is clarified that in case where full upfront payment is made by the telecom op, GST would be payable when the payment of the said upfront amount is made or due whichever is earlier.
    2. In case where the deferred payment is made by the telecom operator in specified instalments, GST would be payable as and when the payments are due or made whichever is earlier.

    Additional Resources

    • Tags
    • indirect tax alert

    What can we help you achieve?

    Stay one step ahead in a rapidly changing world and build
    a sustainable future with us.